<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Did Pool Score Shoppers.com?  A Glitch.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/02/07/how-did-pool-score-shopperscom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/02/07/how-did-pool-score-shopperscom/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire: Buyer of $166,000 Shoppers.com Can Keep Domain Name at Conceptualist.com, By Sahar Sarid</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/02/07/how-did-pool-score-shopperscom/comment-page-1/#comment-167017</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire: Buyer of $166,000 Shoppers.com Can Keep Domain Name at Conceptualist.com, By Sahar Sarid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/02/07/how-did-pool-score-shopperscom/#comment-167017</guid>
		<description>[...] That’s exactly what happened to Xedoc Holding SA, which bought Shoppers.com at Pool in February. The domain was previously registered at Network Solutions, but was not auctioned at NameJet due to a glitch. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] That’s exactly what happened to Xedoc Holding SA, which bought Shoppers.com at Pool in February. The domain was previously registered at Network Solutions, but was not auctioned at NameJet due to a glitch. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Buyer of $166,000 Shoppers.com Can Keep Domain Name - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/02/07/how-did-pool-score-shopperscom/comment-page-1/#comment-167009</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Buyer of $166,000 Shoppers.com Can Keep Domain Name - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/02/07/how-did-pool-score-shopperscom/#comment-167009</guid>
		<description>[...] That&#8217;s exactly what happened to Xedoc Holding SA, which bought Shoppers.com at Pool in February. The domain was previously registered at Network Solutions, but was not auctioned at NameJet due to a glitch. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] That&#8217;s exactly what happened to Xedoc Holding SA, which bought Shoppers.com at Pool in February. The domain was previously registered at Network Solutions, but was not auctioned at NameJet due to a glitch. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Shoppers.com in Dispute? Also GoogleAdwords.com and Ace.us - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/02/07/how-did-pool-score-shopperscom/comment-page-1/#comment-157309</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Shoppers.com in Dispute? Also GoogleAdwords.com and Ace.us - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/02/07/how-did-pool-score-shopperscom/#comment-157309</guid>
		<description>[...]  Shoppers.com expired last month and was picked up by Pool. Auction winner Xedoc Holding SA forked over $166,000 for the domain, but is that now at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...]  Shoppers.com expired last month and was picked up by Pool. Auction winner Xedoc Holding SA forked over $166,000 for the domain, but is that now at [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theAve</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/02/07/how-did-pool-score-shopperscom/comment-page-1/#comment-151432</link>
		<dc:creator>theAve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/02/07/how-did-pool-score-shopperscom/#comment-151432</guid>
		<description>Even with all the automation, the human factor still comes into play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even with all the automation, the human factor still comes into play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shoppers.com ended at Pool due to a NetSol glitch</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/02/07/how-did-pool-score-shopperscom/comment-page-1/#comment-149033</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoppers.com ended at Pool due to a NetSol glitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 20:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/02/07/how-did-pool-score-shopperscom/#comment-149033</guid>
		<description>[...] is complaining at Pool.com that&#8217;s for sure. For more on the story, check out this post at Domain Name Wire.   These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] is complaining at Pool.com that&#8217;s for sure. For more on the story, check out this post at Domain Name Wire.   These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/02/07/how-did-pool-score-shopperscom/comment-page-1/#comment-148362</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/02/07/how-did-pool-score-shopperscom/#comment-148362</guid>
		<description>@Basicity - yes, if not one pre-orders them then they get released.  Of course, eNom (which co-owns NameJet) is one of the companies &lt;a href=&quot;http://domainnamewire.com/2008/01/30/cadna-releases-report-on-domain-name-drop-catching/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cited in a recent CADNA report&lt;/a&gt; as tasting the domains that expire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Basicity &#8211; yes, if not one pre-orders them then they get released.  Of course, eNom (which co-owns NameJet) is one of the companies <a href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/01/30/cadna-releases-report-on-domain-name-drop-catching/" rel="nofollow">cited in a recent CADNA report</a> as tasting the domains that expire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basicity</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/02/07/how-did-pool-score-shopperscom/comment-page-1/#comment-148351</link>
		<dc:creator>Basicity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/02/07/how-did-pool-score-shopperscom/#comment-148351</guid>
		<description>Just a quick question. So expired NetSol domains go to NameJet. Do these expired domains in NameJet ever make it back to the open ocean (ie, available for anyone to register) if no one  buys them through NameJet?

This scenario reminds me of the Michael Bay&#039;s movie The Island with Ewan McGregor and Scarlett Johansson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick question. So expired NetSol domains go to NameJet. Do these expired domains in NameJet ever make it back to the open ocean (ie, available for anyone to register) if no one  buys them through NameJet?</p>
<p>This scenario reminds me of the Michael Bay&#8217;s movie The Island with Ewan McGregor and Scarlett Johansson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
