<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Most .mobi Domains Won at Sedo Auctions are Out of Compliance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2007/12/19/most-mobi-domains-won-at-sedo-auctions-are-out-of-compliance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/12/19/most-mobi-domains-won-at-sedo-auctions-are-out-of-compliance/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:12:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve M.</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/12/19/most-mobi-domains-won-at-sedo-auctions-are-out-of-compliance/comment-page-1/#comment-122867</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 03:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/12/19/most-mobi-domains-won-at-sedo-auctions-are-out-of-compliance/#comment-122867</guid>
		<description>It&#039;ll be surprising indeed if the mTLD folks even try to enforce their &quot;use&quot; requirements on anyone...

While the use rules are admirable on their face for trying to insure the domains are placed into actual (ie non-parking) use, the odds that any of the .mobi buyers would allow mTLD to take their non-compliant domains back--much less without full refunds--are about zero.

The lawsuits that such attempts would immediately generate would likely bankrupt mTLD (just try getting agreement on what their terms &quot;best efforts,&quot; &quot;related to,&quot; &quot;primarily containing,&quot; etc means); which would do no one any good.

As a result, here&#039;s what the future of .mobi will look like in the years to come:

#1. A few--less than 25%--will have actual, usable, mobile-type/compliant content as part of being run like the real businesses they were intended for.

#2. The other 75% will either not resolve or have PPC/ Adsense/ CPA ads on them; as their owners wait (pray) for others to pay them even more than they (mostly over)paid for them the first time around.

.mobi? DOA. RIP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll be surprising indeed if the mTLD folks even try to enforce their &#8220;use&#8221; requirements on anyone&#8230;</p>
<p>While the use rules are admirable on their face for trying to insure the domains are placed into actual (ie non-parking) use, the odds that any of the .mobi buyers would allow mTLD to take their non-compliant domains back&#8211;much less without full refunds&#8211;are about zero.</p>
<p>The lawsuits that such attempts would immediately generate would likely bankrupt mTLD (just try getting agreement on what their terms &#8220;best efforts,&#8221; &#8220;related to,&#8221; &#8220;primarily containing,&#8221; etc means); which would do no one any good.</p>
<p>As a result, here&#8217;s what the future of .mobi will look like in the years to come:</p>
<p>#1. A few&#8211;less than 25%&#8211;will have actual, usable, mobile-type/compliant content as part of being run like the real businesses they were intended for.</p>
<p>#2. The other 75% will either not resolve or have PPC/ Adsense/ CPA ads on them; as their owners wait (pray) for others to pay them even more than they (mostly over)paid for them the first time around.</p>
<p>.mobi? DOA. RIP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/12/19/most-mobi-domains-won-at-sedo-auctions-are-out-of-compliance/comment-page-1/#comment-122826</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/12/19/most-mobi-domains-won-at-sedo-auctions-are-out-of-compliance/#comment-122826</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link David.  It looks like he wrote that article before the music.mobi and games.mobi auctions were voided.

I still think .mobi is risky.  Although more and more people will use mobile phones to access the internet, the activities they perform will be limited until browsing on a phone becomes as convenient as doing it on a desktop.  At that point, won&#039;t browser be compatible with most .com sites?

Another funny thing...Matt&#039;s article has an ad link in it to &quot;Premium Domain Names&quot;.  It&#039;s a link to competitor BuyDomains :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link David.  It looks like he wrote that article before the music.mobi and games.mobi auctions were voided.</p>
<p>I still think .mobi is risky.  Although more and more people will use mobile phones to access the internet, the activities they perform will be limited until browsing on a phone becomes as convenient as doing it on a desktop.  At that point, won&#8217;t browser be compatible with most .com sites?</p>
<p>Another funny thing&#8230;Matt&#8217;s article has an ad link in it to &#8220;Premium Domain Names&#8221;.  It&#8217;s a link to competitor BuyDomains <img src='http://domainnamewire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/12/19/most-mobi-domains-won-at-sedo-auctions-are-out-of-compliance/comment-page-1/#comment-122713</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/12/19/most-mobi-domains-won-at-sedo-auctions-are-out-of-compliance/#comment-122713</guid>
		<description>mb, this has nothing to do with the 6 month requirement.  The domains should already have a compliant parking page per the requirements.

p.s. thanks for pointing out my minor typo of compliant.  Clearly I&#039;m able to spell it correctly since it was right in the title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mb, this has nothing to do with the 6 month requirement.  The domains should already have a compliant parking page per the requirements.</p>
<p>p.s. thanks for pointing out my minor typo of compliant.  Clearly I&#8217;m able to spell it correctly since it was right in the title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mb</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/12/19/most-mobi-domains-won-at-sedo-auctions-are-out-of-compliance/comment-page-1/#comment-122708</link>
		<dc:creator>mb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/12/19/most-mobi-domains-won-at-sedo-auctions-are-out-of-compliance/#comment-122708</guid>
		<description>Last time I checked it is Dec.  The transfer of names is just going through and we are no where near 6mths removed from the sales so why don’t we hold off a bit on these types of remarks.  P.S. your inability to spell compliant (as opposed to complaint which is what you seem to have) makes your article look absolutely silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last time I checked it is Dec.  The transfer of names is just going through and we are no where near 6mths removed from the sales so why don’t we hold off a bit on these types of remarks.  P.S. your inability to spell compliant (as opposed to complaint which is what you seem to have) makes your article look absolutely silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J Castello</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/12/19/most-mobi-domains-won-at-sedo-auctions-are-out-of-compliance/comment-page-1/#comment-122603</link>
		<dc:creator>David J Castello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/12/19/most-mobi-domains-won-at-sedo-auctions-are-out-of-compliance/#comment-122603</guid>
		<description>Article published today about Sedo&#039;s position on .mobi: http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/Mobi-A-Safe-Real-Estate-Bet-60741.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Article published today about Sedo&#8217;s position on .mobi: <a href="http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/Mobi-A-Safe-Real-Estate-Bet-60741.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/Mobi-A-Safe-Real-Estate-Bet-60741.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
