<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GeoDomains Auction Sells $480,000 Domains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2007/11/19/geodomains-auction-sells-480000-domains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/11/19/geodomains-auction-sells-480000-domains/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gene Downs</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/11/19/geodomains-auction-sells-480000-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-111577</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Downs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/11/19/geodomains-auction-sells-480000-domains/#comment-111577</guid>
		<description>I thought Perth.com was worth a lot more than $200k , maybe it did not have a lot of exposure before the auction.  I bet the buyer is pleased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Perth.com was worth a lot more than $200k , maybe it did not have a lot of exposure before the auction.  I bet the buyer is pleased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Menius</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/11/19/geodomains-auction-sells-480000-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-110300</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Menius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/11/19/geodomains-auction-sells-480000-domains/#comment-110300</guid>
		<description>SanFrancisco.US - What a great name! Easily worth much more than 25k. I&#039;d be fine to sit on that one, no hurry. Huge population, many businesses/real estate companies, tech, tourism. Matter of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SanFrancisco.US &#8211; What a great name! Easily worth much more than 25k. I&#8217;d be fine to sit on that one, no hurry. Huge population, many businesses/real estate companies, tech, tourism. Matter of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/11/19/geodomains-auction-sells-480000-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-109837</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/11/19/geodomains-auction-sells-480000-domains/#comment-109837</guid>
		<description>213.com and 408.com...Los Angeles and San Jose respectively...very nice domains.  But I haven&#039;t seen many successful area code domains.  I looked into buying 512 once (Austin).  The seller asked for $20k.  Many big cities have a couple area codes, which makes it harder to brand with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>213.com and 408.com&#8230;Los Angeles and San Jose respectively&#8230;very nice domains.  But I haven&#8217;t seen many successful area code domains.  I looked into buying 512 once (Austin).  The seller asked for $20k.  Many big cities have a couple area codes, which makes it harder to brand with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/11/19/geodomains-auction-sells-480000-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-109835</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/11/19/geodomains-auction-sells-480000-domains/#comment-109835</guid>
		<description>Yes, Jeff, Fresno.us was one I specifically saw.  Good job on your post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Jeff, Fresno.us was one I specifically saw.  Good job on your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/11/19/geodomains-auction-sells-480000-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-109810</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/11/19/geodomains-auction-sells-480000-domains/#comment-109810</guid>
		<description>Great roundup Andrew.  It does look like there was some post-auction activity.  For instance, during the auction Fresno.us was passed at $3,000 and now it looks like it sold for $4,800.

I hope that you get the prices you are looking for on your domains!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great roundup Andrew.  It does look like there was some post-auction activity.  For instance, during the auction Fresno.us was passed at $3,000 and now it looks like it sold for $4,800.</p>
<p>I hope that you get the prices you are looking for on your domains!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DR.DOMAIN</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/11/19/geodomains-auction-sells-480000-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-109581</link>
		<dc:creator>DR.DOMAIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/11/19/geodomains-auction-sells-480000-domains/#comment-109581</guid>
		<description>213 and 408.com are UNDER-VALUED.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>213 and 408.com are UNDER-VALUED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
