<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wedding.net Snags $75,000 Bid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2007/06/18/weddingnet-snags-75000-bid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/06/18/weddingnet-snags-75000-bid/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:34:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DotSauce Domain News Magazine &#187; Wedding.Net Sells for $75,0000</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/06/18/weddingnet-snags-75000-bid/comment-page-1/#comment-79884</link>
		<dc:creator>DotSauce Domain News Magazine &#187; Wedding.Net Sells for $75,0000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/06/18/weddingnet-snags-75000-bid/#comment-79884</guid>
		<description>[...] The dot net domain extension is of course a huge underdog when it comes to aftermarket sales for generic domains. Only a handful of premium names have fetched notable sales prices. A few days ago Domain Name Wire wrote that Wedding.net had received a bid of $75,000 on the Afternic domain auction website. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] The dot net domain extension is of course a huge underdog when it comes to aftermarket sales for generic domains. Only a handful of premium names have fetched notable sales prices. A few days ago Domain Name Wire wrote that Wedding.net had received a bid of $75,000 on the Afternic domain auction website. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claude Gelinas</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/06/18/weddingnet-snags-75000-bid/comment-page-1/#comment-79621</link>
		<dc:creator>Claude Gelinas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 03:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/06/18/weddingnet-snags-75000-bid/#comment-79621</guid>
		<description>For a dot net, this is a great offer!

For any company dealing in weddings, &quot;wedding.net&quot; is an awesome &quot;calling card&quot;... and it&#039;s easy to remember, even a few days before one gets married ; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a dot net, this is a great offer!</p>
<p>For any company dealing in weddings, &#8220;wedding.net&#8221; is an awesome &#8220;calling card&#8221;&#8230; and it&#8217;s easy to remember, even a few days before one gets married ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basicity</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/06/18/weddingnet-snags-75000-bid/comment-page-1/#comment-79556</link>
		<dc:creator>Basicity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/06/18/weddingnet-snags-75000-bid/#comment-79556</guid>
		<description>I bet you Kevin Ham and his team are behind this purchase. In the recent Business2.0 article, Dr. Ham talked about his liking of weddings-related domain names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet you Kevin Ham and his team are behind this purchase. In the recent Business2.0 article, Dr. Ham talked about his liking of weddings-related domain names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
