Comments on: Los Angeles Angels Lose Fight for Angels.com Domain Name http://domainnamewire.com/2007/05/23/los-angeles-angels-lose-fight-for-angelscom-domain-name/ News and Views for the Domain Name Industry Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:58:31 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Mike http://domainnamewire.com/2007/05/23/los-angeles-angels-lose-fight-for-angelscom-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-392051 Mike Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:30:39 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/2007/05/23/los-angeles-angels-lose-fight-for-angelscom-domain-name/#comment-392051 I have a neighbor with a very nice Lincoln Town Car. He NEVER uses it for anything. The only miles on are the ones he used 6 years ago when he bought it to get it home from the dealer. That car would benefit me much more than him because I would be willing to actually use the car. I think I shall sue him for rights to the beautiful car that he is unwilling to use because I don't think I should have to pay what might be fair value for it if I want it. I have a neighbor with a very nice Lincoln Town Car. He NEVER uses it for anything. The only miles on are the ones he used 6 years ago when he bought it to get it home from the dealer.

That car would benefit me much more than him because I would be willing to actually use the car. I think I shall sue him for rights to the beautiful car that he is unwilling to use because I don’t think I should have to pay what might be fair value for it if I want it.

]]> By: Zack http://domainnamewire.com/2007/05/23/los-angeles-angels-lose-fight-for-angelscom-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-384278 Zack Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:02:05 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/2007/05/23/los-angeles-angels-lose-fight-for-angelscom-domain-name/#comment-384278 LOL The Angles deserve that!!!! He dissed them. And anyways they cheaped out Josh Beckett LOL The Angles deserve that!!!! He dissed them. And anyways they cheaped out Josh Beckett

]]> By: SCOTT http://domainnamewire.com/2007/05/23/los-angeles-angels-lose-fight-for-angelscom-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-304757 SCOTT Sat, 27 Dec 2008 10:41:45 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/2007/05/23/los-angeles-angels-lose-fight-for-angelscom-domain-name/#comment-304757 YOU BUNCH OF DISREPECTCTFUL PRICKS WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO OLD FSHIONED VALUES YOU BUNCH OF DISREPECTCTFUL PRICKS WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO OLD FSHIONED VALUES

]]> By: Sam Walton http://domainnamewire.com/2007/05/23/los-angeles-angels-lose-fight-for-angelscom-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-268599 Sam Walton Sun, 26 Oct 2008 03:25:40 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/2007/05/23/los-angeles-angels-lose-fight-for-angelscom-domain-name/#comment-268599 The owner clearly had profit in mind when buying the site for $25,000 dollars. It's been 3 years or so, wouldn't he have done something productive with it? Who is the one who called the owner a "little guy?" How many little guys buy domain property at $25,000? The owner clearly had profit in mind when buying the site for $25,000 dollars. It’s been 3 years or so, wouldn’t he have done something productive with it?

Who is the one who called the owner a “little guy?” How many little guys buy domain property at $25,000?

]]> By: Andrew http://domainnamewire.com/2007/05/23/los-angeles-angels-lose-fight-for-angelscom-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-266794 Andrew Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:21:32 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/2007/05/23/los-angeles-angels-lose-fight-for-angelscom-domain-name/#comment-266794 Walt, we'll have to agree to disagree on this one. The owner has it, the Angels have no inherent right to it, so it's up to him to decide if he wants to sell. Walt, we’ll have to agree to disagree on this one. The owner has it, the Angels have no inherent right to it, so it’s up to him to decide if he wants to sell.

]]> By: Walt http://domainnamewire.com/2007/05/23/los-angeles-angels-lose-fight-for-angelscom-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-266789 Walt Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:10:32 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/2007/05/23/los-angeles-angels-lose-fight-for-angelscom-domain-name/#comment-266789 Andrew, I understand what you're trying to get at with your sarcasm but, to be honest, I don't agree with you. I wouldn't say the LA Angels should get the domain for free, but for a reasonable price based on how many views the site gets. If that empty lot was on Microsoft Lane, I'm sure Microsoft would buy it for a more than reasonable price. If the owner of Angels.com was actually using the domain for something productive, my views would probably be different. But seeing a great domain name go to waste just bothers me. I understand what the owner is trying to do with the domain; he is holding onto it while the price rises until he sees fit to sell it. I must add in, the web is not a stock market, and if the owner is not going to use the domain, then the LA Angels should be able to buy it off him for a reasonable price. Andrew, I understand what you’re trying to get at with your sarcasm but, to be honest, I don’t agree with you. I wouldn’t say the LA Angels should get the domain for free, but for a reasonable price based on how many views the site gets. If that empty lot was on Microsoft Lane, I’m sure Microsoft would buy it for a more than reasonable price. If the owner of Angels.com was actually using the domain for something productive, my views would probably be different. But seeing a great domain name go to waste just bothers me. I understand what the owner is trying to do with the domain; he is holding onto it while the price rises until he sees fit to sell it. I must add in, the web is not a stock market, and if the owner is not going to use the domain, then the LA Angels should be able to buy it off him for a reasonable price.

]]> By: Andrew http://domainnamewire.com/2007/05/23/los-angeles-angels-lose-fight-for-angelscom-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-226692 Andrew Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:33:52 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/2007/05/23/los-angeles-angels-lose-fight-for-angelscom-domain-name/#comment-226692 Nick, you couldn't be more right. I mean, there's this empty lot down the street from me. It's full of weeds and hasn't been built on in 50 years! I should totally be able to take that lot from the current owner and build a new house on it. Nick, you couldn’t be more right. I mean, there’s this empty lot down the street from me. It’s full of weeds and hasn’t been built on in 50 years! I should totally be able to take that lot from the current owner and build a new house on it.

]]>