<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wall Street Journal Profiles .mobi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2007/04/05/wall-street-journal-profiles-mobi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/04/05/wall-street-journal-profiles-mobi/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 20:39:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speakingouttruth</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/04/05/wall-street-journal-profiles-mobi/comment-page-1/#comment-59764</link>
		<dc:creator>Speakingouttruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/04/05/wall-street-journal-profiles-mobi/#comment-59764</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the real logical deal on .mobi:

If the cellphone providers start buying up .mobi domains, then the .mobi revolution is own. If not... it&#039;s a long road ahead.

I am brokering dine.mobi for $50,000. If .mobi was really accepted as a great new extension, this domain would be picked up at that price in a few days.  Email me at 
spritzenfoogle (at) yahoo (dot) com

Let&#039;s see some people put their money where their mouths are... because anyone knows that DINE.MOBI is worth at least HALF of &quot;flowers.mobi&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the real logical deal on .mobi:</p>
<p>If the cellphone providers start buying up .mobi domains, then the .mobi revolution is own. If not&#8230; it&#8217;s a long road ahead.</p>
<p>I am brokering dine.mobi for $50,000. If .mobi was really accepted as a great new extension, this domain would be picked up at that price in a few days.  Email me at<br />
spritzenfoogle (at) yahoo (dot) com</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see some people put their money where their mouths are&#8230; because anyone knows that DINE.MOBI is worth at least HALF of &#8220;flowers.mobi&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad F</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/04/05/wall-street-journal-profiles-mobi/comment-page-1/#comment-59725</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 20:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/04/05/wall-street-journal-profiles-mobi/#comment-59725</guid>
		<description>cont&#039;d

For ppc on mobile sites, also see:
http://medio.com

Which was recently introduced.

This is growing very fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cont&#8217;d</p>
<p>For ppc on mobile sites, also see:<br />
<a href="http://medio.com" rel="nofollow">http://medio.com</a></p>
<p>Which was recently introduced.</p>
<p>This is growing very fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad F.</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/04/05/wall-street-journal-profiles-mobi/comment-page-1/#comment-59493</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 05:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/04/05/wall-street-journal-profiles-mobi/#comment-59493</guid>
		<description>&quot;Com and other domains can also be used for mobile devices, so there may not be a need for .mobi&quot;  

- try this and see what you get. no reliably consistent experience, quite jumbled across the board even with many sites having a mobile browser detect ready with xhtml response among a .com folder. 

- .mobi is here to address this with enforcement of coding standards. Rf the user selects .mobi extension, he or she will be assured they won&#039;t be wasting their time.

&quot;...canâ€™t count on much traditional pay-per-click revenue&quot;

- see http://www.admob.com   

Already approaching 2 bil ads served on this network alone.

This general arguement of resistance seems to gain strength in the idea of contrary business development, much like mac and the pc. With, of course, so much resistance to change itself, as always when there is an existing structure in place.

Too, many mobile searches are not yet showing .mobi&#039;s simply because the search engine facilties have not yet adjusted their algorithms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Com and other domains can also be used for mobile devices, so there may not be a need for .mobi&#8221;  </p>
<p>- try this and see what you get. no reliably consistent experience, quite jumbled across the board even with many sites having a mobile browser detect ready with xhtml response among a .com folder. </p>
<p>- .mobi is here to address this with enforcement of coding standards. Rf the user selects .mobi extension, he or she will be assured they won&#8217;t be wasting their time.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;canâ€™t count on much traditional pay-per-click revenue&#8221;</p>
<p>- see <a href="http://www.admob.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.admob.com</a>   </p>
<p>Already approaching 2 bil ads served on this network alone.</p>
<p>This general arguement of resistance seems to gain strength in the idea of contrary business development, much like mac and the pc. With, of course, so much resistance to change itself, as always when there is an existing structure in place.</p>
<p>Too, many mobile searches are not yet showing .mobi&#8217;s simply because the search engine facilties have not yet adjusted their algorithms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

