<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GoDaddy Faces PR Nightmare Over Domain Suspension</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2007/01/26/godaddy-faces-pr-nightmare-over-domain-suspension/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/01/26/godaddy-faces-pr-nightmare-over-domain-suspension/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:34:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Domain Offerings</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/01/26/godaddy-faces-pr-nightmare-over-domain-suspension/comment-page-1/#comment-303472</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Offerings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 00:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/01/26/godaddy-faces-pr-nightmare-over-domain-suspension/#comment-303472</guid>
		<description>I have had my domains with a GoDaddy reseller and I have to say that GoDaddy is absolutely great in the services they provide.  The world is not black and white and sometimes people have to make difficult decisions to protect the innocent. I can see why they may have felt compelled to find a reason to stop the less than honorable practice until the law can catch up with handling the issue. My opinions only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had my domains with a GoDaddy reseller and I have to say that GoDaddy is absolutely great in the services they provide.  The world is not black and white and sometimes people have to make difficult decisions to protect the innocent. I can see why they may have felt compelled to find a reason to stop the less than honorable practice until the law can catch up with handling the issue. My opinions only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; GoDaddy Squashes RateMyCop.com - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/01/26/godaddy-faces-pr-nightmare-over-domain-suspension/comment-page-1/#comment-160125</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; GoDaddy Squashes RateMyCop.com - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/01/26/godaddy-faces-pr-nightmare-over-domain-suspension/#comment-160125</guid>
		<description>[...] comment because of its privacy policy. This sounds strange, as GoDaddy has commented on previous situations like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] comment because of its privacy policy. This sounds strange, as GoDaddy has commented on previous situations like [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jt</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/01/26/godaddy-faces-pr-nightmare-over-domain-suspension/comment-page-1/#comment-135586</link>
		<dc:creator>jt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/01/26/godaddy-faces-pr-nightmare-over-domain-suspension/#comment-135586</guid>
		<description>yes I agree go daddy has always been very good about handling spam. good point, don&#039;t try to do anything illegal and things like this won&#039;t happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes I agree go daddy has always been very good about handling spam. good point, don&#8217;t try to do anything illegal and things like this won&#8217;t happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/01/26/godaddy-faces-pr-nightmare-over-domain-suspension/comment-page-1/#comment-62842</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 14:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/01/26/godaddy-faces-pr-nightmare-over-domain-suspension/#comment-62842</guid>
		<description>Great job Godaddy. I have had my domains registered with them since 2001 and have never had any problems. Why? Because I dont try to do things that are illegal or against their TOS. If it had been the username/password for your hosting account or email account then I am pretty sure you wouldnt want them to wait for a response from the site owner to pull it down. You would want it done then and now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job Godaddy. I have had my domains registered with them since 2001 and have never had any problems. Why? Because I dont try to do things that are illegal or against their TOS. If it had been the username/password for your hosting account or email account then I am pretty sure you wouldnt want them to wait for a response from the site owner to pull it down. You would want it done then and now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/01/26/godaddy-faces-pr-nightmare-over-domain-suspension/comment-page-1/#comment-56651</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/01/26/godaddy-faces-pr-nightmare-over-domain-suspension/#comment-56651</guid>
		<description>Judging by the types of comments I have read I wonder if people even know how the internet works.  Some hosting companies are responsible for the content they host.  But what about the people running their own servers.  How is that controlled?  The only groups that can fully monitor illegal or obscene content is the domain registrars.  I for one would much rather see a site be shut down immediately than leave it up for 24 or 48 hours while waiting for a response from the owner of the site.  If the data is illegal or obscene it should be removed immediately without prejudice.  
I commend GoDaddy for shutting the site down.  I would hate to think what kind of content would still be up if registrars like GoDaddy didn&#039;t shut down sites immediately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging by the types of comments I have read I wonder if people even know how the internet works.  Some hosting companies are responsible for the content they host.  But what about the people running their own servers.  How is that controlled?  The only groups that can fully monitor illegal or obscene content is the domain registrars.  I for one would much rather see a site be shut down immediately than leave it up for 24 or 48 hours while waiting for a response from the owner of the site.  If the data is illegal or obscene it should be removed immediately without prejudice.<br />
I commend GoDaddy for shutting the site down.  I would hate to think what kind of content would still be up if registrars like GoDaddy didn&#8217;t shut down sites immediately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renzo</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/01/26/godaddy-faces-pr-nightmare-over-domain-suspension/comment-page-1/#comment-54183</link>
		<dc:creator>Renzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 01:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/01/26/godaddy-faces-pr-nightmare-over-domain-suspension/#comment-54183</guid>
		<description>GoDaddy by their action have lost many potential customers. 
I have personally translated the article to 3 other languages and posted it in the forums that I participate in. 
Most people, especially those whom have their sites in a language other than English would like some re-assurance. 
With such action and Policy, I truly doubt that anyone would want to buy a domain with them.

I personally am thankful that Fyodor decided to go public with this. Because I have an account with GoDaddy due to renewal, and like hell I would ever consider them ever again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GoDaddy by their action have lost many potential customers.<br />
I have personally translated the article to 3 other languages and posted it in the forums that I participate in.<br />
Most people, especially those whom have their sites in a language other than English would like some re-assurance.<br />
With such action and Policy, I truly doubt that anyone would want to buy a domain with them.</p>
<p>I personally am thankful that Fyodor decided to go public with this. Because I have an account with GoDaddy due to renewal, and like hell I would ever consider them ever again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2007/01/26/godaddy-faces-pr-nightmare-over-domain-suspension/comment-page-1/#comment-50524</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2007/01/26/godaddy-faces-pr-nightmare-over-domain-suspension/#comment-50524</guid>
		<description>GoDaddy are usually good at terminating domains belonging to spammers. That they happen to cut off some h4x0rs that publish phished account information is just a bonus.

In anti-spam forums, GoDaddy have long been &quot;white hat&quot; (a.k.a. Good Guy) because of their good track record in terminating spammer domains. Recently, however, it seems like they are not as proactive, but hopefully that will change back again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GoDaddy are usually good at terminating domains belonging to spammers. That they happen to cut off some h4&#215;0rs that publish phished account information is just a bonus.</p>
<p>In anti-spam forums, GoDaddy have long been &#8220;white hat&#8221; (a.k.a. Good Guy) because of their good track record in terminating spammer domains. Recently, however, it seems like they are not as proactive, but hopefully that will change back again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
