Comments on: Marchex may have $24M in trademark domains http://domainnamewire.com/2006/11/29/marchex-may-have-24m-in-trademark-domains/ Domain Name Industry News and Views Thu, 24 May 2012 13:49:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Xavier http://domainnamewire.com/2006/11/29/marchex-may-have-24m-in-trademark-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-193614 Xavier Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:45:28 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/2006/11/29/marchex-may-have-24m-in-trademark-domains/#comment-193614 It sounds like they could use some help. I'm in Trademark Law, and this is a prime challenge. It sounds like they could use some help. I’m in Trademark Law, and this is a prime challenge.

]]> By: Website-Address.com http://domainnamewire.com/2006/11/29/marchex-may-have-24m-in-trademark-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-23674 Website-Address.com Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:37:09 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/2006/11/29/marchex-may-have-24m-in-trademark-domains/#comment-23674 <strong>Domain Name Stock Performance in 2006...</strong> Domain Name Wire has a great review on some of the stocks that are financially driven by domain name monitization.Some up, some down, but enthusiasm for domain name companies remains high.The review also points out potential issues with some Marchex's...

Domain Name Stock Performance in 2006…

Domain Name Wire has a great review on some of the stocks that are financially driven by domain name monitization.Some up, some down, but enthusiasm for domain name companies remains high.The review also points out potential issues with some Marchex’s…

]]> By: Editor http://domainnamewire.com/2006/11/29/marchex-may-have-24m-in-trademark-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-23511 Editor Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:24:18 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/2006/11/29/marchex-may-have-24m-in-trademark-domains/#comment-23511 Jon, I agree. Take a look at <a href="http://domainnamewire.com/2007/01/02/domain-name-stocks-mixed-in-2006/" rel="nofollow">this post</a>. Jon, I agree. Take a look at this post.

]]> By: Jon http://domainnamewire.com/2006/11/29/marchex-may-have-24m-in-trademark-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-23378 Jon Tue, 02 Jan 2007 01:19:32 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/2006/11/29/marchex-may-have-24m-in-trademark-domains/#comment-23378 Poor execution below for shareholders... Sites they developed using Openlist are not even indexed in search engines yet. Not even sites from several months ago in the beta launch. Below are several sites not even in google. There are many more examples. Just go to google and type in the name (www.XXXXXX). Nothing indexed. They may not be in other engines either. Not even myzip.com is in google, their "gateway" site to zip codes. This is poor execution and lost revenue opportunities. This is not rocket science. Being an investor, I may take a few minutes to submit them myself... www.myzip.com www.restaurantonline.com www.newyorkbagels.com www.dimsum.net www.chicagoluxuryhotels.com www.shanghaihotel.com www.bostonmotels.com Poor execution below for shareholders…

Sites they developed using Openlist are not even indexed in search engines yet. Not even sites from several months ago in the beta launch. Below are several sites not even in google. There are many more examples.

Just go to google and type in the name (www.XXXXXX). Nothing indexed. They may not be in other engines either. Not even myzip.com is in google, their “gateway” site to zip codes. This is poor execution and lost revenue opportunities. This is not rocket science. Being an investor, I may take a few minutes to submit them myself…

http://www.myzip.com
http://www.restaurantonline.com
http://www.newyorkbagels.com
http://www.dimsum.net
http://www.chicagoluxuryhotels.com
http://www.shanghaihotel.com
http://www.bostonmotels.com

]]>