<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Selling Domains 101: Part Two, Domain Aftermarkets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2006/11/21/selling-domains-101-part-two-domain-aftermarkets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/11/21/selling-domains-101-part-two-domain-aftermarkets/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:58:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DOMAINNAME PARKING &#124; DomainBörsen vergleich – Afternic vs Sedo</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/11/21/selling-domains-101-part-two-domain-aftermarkets/comment-page-1/#comment-62060</link>
		<dc:creator>DOMAINNAME PARKING &#124; DomainBörsen vergleich – Afternic vs Sedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2006/11/21/selling-domains-101-part-two-domain-aftermarkets/#comment-62060</guid>
		<description>[...] Andrew Allemann von domainnamewire.com hat sich die unterschiedlichen Domain-Handelsb&#246;rsen angeschaut und die beiden bekanntesten, afternic.com und sedo.de, miteinander verglichen. Er beginnt mit deren Geschichten, die unterschiedlicher kaum sein k&#246;nnten: Afternic startete ca. 1999 und fand w&#228;hrend der Dotcom-Euphorie im Jahr 2000 in Register.com einen K&#228;ufer, der bereit war, rund US$ 45 Mio. zu investieren (US$ 35 Mio. in Aktien und US$ 10 Mio. in bar). Doch nachdem die Blase geplatzt war, schloss man auch bei Register.com die B&#246;rse und verkaufte sie 2002 an Namebuysell, ein von Roger Collins geleitetes Unternehmen, das seit der &#220;bernahme von Afternic im Dezember 2002 unter diesem Namen firmiert. Unter Collins H&#228;nden wurde Afternic zum Erfolg. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Andrew Allemann von domainnamewire.com hat sich die unterschiedlichen Domain-Handelsb&#246;rsen angeschaut und die beiden bekanntesten, afternic.com und sedo.de, miteinander verglichen. Er beginnt mit deren Geschichten, die unterschiedlicher kaum sein k&#246;nnten: Afternic startete ca. 1999 und fand w&#228;hrend der Dotcom-Euphorie im Jahr 2000 in Register.com einen K&#228;ufer, der bereit war, rund US$ 45 Mio. zu investieren (US$ 35 Mio. in Aktien und US$ 10 Mio. in bar). Doch nachdem die Blase geplatzt war, schloss man auch bei Register.com die B&#246;rse und verkaufte sie 2002 an Namebuysell, ein von Roger Collins geleitetes Unternehmen, das seit der &#220;bernahme von Afternic im Dezember 2002 unter diesem Namen firmiert. Unter Collins H&#228;nden wurde Afternic zum Erfolg. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/11/21/selling-domains-101-part-two-domain-aftermarkets/comment-page-1/#comment-18976</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 03:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2006/11/21/selling-domains-101-part-two-domain-aftermarkets/#comment-18976</guid>
		<description>Geoff, hopefully I&#039;ll get a chance to do that.  Thanks for the suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff, hopefully I&#8217;ll get a chance to do that.  Thanks for the suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/11/21/selling-domains-101-part-two-domain-aftermarkets/comment-page-1/#comment-18925</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 20:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2006/11/21/selling-domains-101-part-two-domain-aftermarkets/#comment-18925</guid>
		<description>Great overview of the sales process.  It was very helpful for a newbie like myself.  If you ever consider adding related walkthroughs, I could use some advice on expired name auctions.  I am experimenting with SnapNames now, but I am doing blindly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great overview of the sales process.  It was very helpful for a newbie like myself.  If you ever consider adding related walkthroughs, I could use some advice on expired name auctions.  I am experimenting with SnapNames now, but I am doing blindly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Douglas</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/11/21/selling-domains-101-part-two-domain-aftermarkets/comment-page-1/#comment-18567</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2006/11/21/selling-domains-101-part-two-domain-aftermarkets/#comment-18567</guid>
		<description>Excellent part 2 of the article, Andrew. You gave an objective report without seeming to stroke each of the companies. I always wondered about domain journalists who are in the domain game and how that effects their &quot;opinion&quot; when discussing domain services that can benefit them. Some domain industry reporting sites feature articles that are so sugar-coated and gooey over the subjects that I get a weird feeling maple syrup has just been poured into my skull.  I want real reporting, indepth drilling into the subject&#039;s website, business activities, reputation and anything else that can give me more information. I want the good and bad, not just &quot;I was there, I know this guy, here&#039;s the syrup, everything is wonderful&quot;.  Your site avoids that. Thanks.

My own experience found that Afternic&#039;s system is more personal and they pay faster, but Sedo gets the bigger purchase prices. My opinion is based on a limited series of sales though. Most of my sales come from direct contact through the &quot;for sale&quot; link on my landing pages, from direct contact cold-calls to the enduser or from the whois.

Moniker&#039;s system is geared for large portfolios and I have a lot of faith in their ability to facilitate those sales. Their customer service is top notch, as is most of the aftermarket domain sellers.

For your readers looking to move a lot of domains quickly, I have a new system that they might be interested in, it&#039;s almost finished and ready to launch. This system only sells domains in bulk, and the minimum purchase price for any amount of domains is $300. I recommend the system be used for unloading decent domains that aren&#039;t in the domainer&#039;s niche anymore but are quality domains that can be sold from $25+ each in bulk.  There&#039;s no auction, it&#039;s just &quot;pay the price and take home the groceries&quot;. 

On the other hand, i won&#039;t allow overblown prices to appear on the site. We don&#039;t take any part of the sale, and we will only charge a $1 per domain listing fee. The listing term is for 90 days. It&#039;s there until it sells or the seller removes it or the 90 days is up (where they can renew the listing). There is no membership fee but there is a registration. I&#039;ll keep you updated on this new system as it is completed and bug tested. If you remember, I developed the exclusive but short-lived Dropguild system, which ENom bought and has locked away (when and if it appears again under their auspices, I don&#039;t know).

The name of our new bulk sale domain website is - quite relevant -- http://www.bulksaledomains.com.  ;-)

We welcome any new registrants to sign up and test the system for free right now. Beware, however, we won&#039;t take domains we consider unsellable at any price, so don&#039;t bring junk. 

Again, great article, Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent part 2 of the article, Andrew. You gave an objective report without seeming to stroke each of the companies. I always wondered about domain journalists who are in the domain game and how that effects their &#8220;opinion&#8221; when discussing domain services that can benefit them. Some domain industry reporting sites feature articles that are so sugar-coated and gooey over the subjects that I get a weird feeling maple syrup has just been poured into my skull.  I want real reporting, indepth drilling into the subject&#8217;s website, business activities, reputation and anything else that can give me more information. I want the good and bad, not just &#8220;I was there, I know this guy, here&#8217;s the syrup, everything is wonderful&#8221;.  Your site avoids that. Thanks.</p>
<p>My own experience found that Afternic&#8217;s system is more personal and they pay faster, but Sedo gets the bigger purchase prices. My opinion is based on a limited series of sales though. Most of my sales come from direct contact through the &#8220;for sale&#8221; link on my landing pages, from direct contact cold-calls to the enduser or from the whois.</p>
<p>Moniker&#8217;s system is geared for large portfolios and I have a lot of faith in their ability to facilitate those sales. Their customer service is top notch, as is most of the aftermarket domain sellers.</p>
<p>For your readers looking to move a lot of domains quickly, I have a new system that they might be interested in, it&#8217;s almost finished and ready to launch. This system only sells domains in bulk, and the minimum purchase price for any amount of domains is $300. I recommend the system be used for unloading decent domains that aren&#8217;t in the domainer&#8217;s niche anymore but are quality domains that can be sold from $25+ each in bulk.  There&#8217;s no auction, it&#8217;s just &#8220;pay the price and take home the groceries&#8221;. </p>
<p>On the other hand, i won&#8217;t allow overblown prices to appear on the site. We don&#8217;t take any part of the sale, and we will only charge a $1 per domain listing fee. The listing term is for 90 days. It&#8217;s there until it sells or the seller removes it or the 90 days is up (where they can renew the listing). There is no membership fee but there is a registration. I&#8217;ll keep you updated on this new system as it is completed and bug tested. If you remember, I developed the exclusive but short-lived Dropguild system, which ENom bought and has locked away (when and if it appears again under their auspices, I don&#8217;t know).</p>
<p>The name of our new bulk sale domain website is &#8211; quite relevant &#8212; <a href="http://www.bulksaledomains.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bulksaledomains.com</a>.  <img src='http://domainnamewire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>We welcome any new registrants to sign up and test the system for free right now. Beware, however, we won&#8217;t take domains we consider unsellable at any price, so don&#8217;t bring junk. </p>
<p>Again, great article, Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
