<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Domain names are today&#8217;s topic on Capitol Hill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2006/09/20/domain-names-are-todays-topic-on-capitol-hill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/09/20/domain-names-are-todays-topic-on-capitol-hill/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:07:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/09/20/domain-names-are-todays-topic-on-capitol-hill/comment-page-1/#comment-10925</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 03:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2006/09/20/domain-names-are-todays-topic-on-capitol-hill/#comment-10925</guid>
		<description>.com = $8.95
.net = $8.99

It&#039;s not much, but it should be about $1.50 less than a .com if GoDaddy was passing savings on to the consumer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.com = $8.95<br />
.net = $8.99</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not much, but it should be about $1.50 less than a .com if GoDaddy was passing savings on to the consumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/09/20/domain-names-are-todays-topic-on-capitol-hill/comment-page-1/#comment-10731</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 15:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2006/09/20/domain-names-are-todays-topic-on-capitol-hill/#comment-10731</guid>
		<description>This is a very interesting debate and I am happy to see you are bringing it up. Verisign has been an outright bully for far too long in this Industry.

However, your last remark about GD charging more for .net&#039;s rings hollow. Please cite this reference with a link to the innacuraccy. When I go to their site it seems that .net and .coms are the same rate. Please let me know where my misunderstanding has occured.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting debate and I am happy to see you are bringing it up. Verisign has been an outright bully for far too long in this Industry.</p>
<p>However, your last remark about GD charging more for .net&#8217;s rings hollow. Please cite this reference with a link to the innacuraccy. When I go to their site it seems that .net and .coms are the same rate. Please let me know where my misunderstanding has occured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
