<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moniker Acquired</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2006/08/08/moniker-acquired/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/08/08/moniker-acquired/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 09:46:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: If There Ever Was A Namecritic Brand It&#8217;s Dead In The Water &#171; Scams By Article Content Provider&#8217;s Chris McElroy / Namecritic</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/08/08/moniker-acquired/comment-page-1/#comment-162013</link>
		<dc:creator>If There Ever Was A Namecritic Brand It&#8217;s Dead In The Water &#171; Scams By Article Content Provider&#8217;s Chris McElroy / Namecritic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2006/08/08/moniker-acquired/#comment-162013</guid>
		<description>[...] He claims, on his blog, this was because he was an expert at evaulating domain names. As other domain evaluators prospered Namecritic done the polar opposite. Now, what he considered his only asset, the Namecritic brand, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] He claims, on his blog, this was because he was an expert at evaulating domain names. As other domain evaluators prospered Namecritic done the polar opposite. Now, what he considered his only asset, the Namecritic brand, [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

