<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is GoDaddy violating ICANNâ€™s transfer policy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2006/04/11/is-godaddy-violating-icann%e2%80%99s-transfer-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/04/11/is-godaddy-violating-icann%e2%80%99s-transfer-policy/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 22:02:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohboy</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/04/11/is-godaddy-violating-icann%e2%80%99s-transfer-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1320391</link>
		<dc:creator>ohboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2006/04/11/is-godaddy-violating-icann%e2%80%99s-transfer-policy/#comment-1320391</guid>
		<description>2011 and STILL the same sleazy tactics. Oh well, at least I&#039;m leaving them with a fight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2011 and STILL the same sleazy tactics. Oh well, at least I&#8217;m leaving them with a fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spaghetti</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/04/11/is-godaddy-violating-icann%e2%80%99s-transfer-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-588833</link>
		<dc:creator>Spaghetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 07:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2006/04/11/is-godaddy-violating-icann%e2%80%99s-transfer-policy/#comment-588833</guid>
		<description>This behavior doesn&#039;t surprise me in the least. In dealing with GoDaddy&#039;s help desk one is not sure if there&#039;s a human on the other end! and the user interface seems to have been written for Geeks or Morons, (or machines!)
Very valuable article, Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This behavior doesn&#8217;t surprise me in the least. In dealing with GoDaddy&#8217;s help desk one is not sure if there&#8217;s a human on the other end! and the user interface seems to have been written for Geeks or Morons, (or machines!)<br />
Very valuable article, Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ED</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/04/11/is-godaddy-violating-icann%e2%80%99s-transfer-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-461816</link>
		<dc:creator>ED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2006/04/11/is-godaddy-violating-icann%e2%80%99s-transfer-policy/#comment-461816</guid>
		<description>2009 and this is STILL an issue. Everyone needs o keep an eye out for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2009 and this is STILL an issue. Everyone needs o keep an eye out for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/04/11/is-godaddy-violating-icann%e2%80%99s-transfer-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-2306</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2006/04/11/is-godaddy-violating-icann%e2%80%99s-transfer-policy/#comment-2306</guid>
		<description>You may recall I tried to take advantage of a $4.00 RegisterFly transfer promotion and had 58 names blocked.  RegisterFly then kept the cash in their holding account!

I called and emailed GoDaddy several times and eventually agreed to disagree.  Next time I&#039;ll try the president too!  Well done, Editor, for your perseverance on this issue.



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may recall I tried to take advantage of a $4.00 RegisterFly transfer promotion and had 58 names blocked.  RegisterFly then kept the cash in their holding account!</p>
<p>I called and emailed GoDaddy several times and eventually agreed to disagree.  Next time I&#8217;ll try the president too!  Well done, Editor, for your perseverance on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: max</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/04/11/is-godaddy-violating-icann%e2%80%99s-transfer-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-2202</link>
		<dc:creator>max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2006/04/11/is-godaddy-violating-icann%e2%80%99s-transfer-policy/#comment-2202</guid>
		<description>GODaddy, Network Solutions, and many other registrars also violate another issue;

They make you renew your domain prior to a transfer, this is a violation according to ICANN. This question is posted at the ICANN website;

www.icann.org/compliance/


My domain name has just expired. Can my registrar require me to pay for a renewal before I can transfer to a new registrar?

No. Your new registrar of choice can initiate a transfer request on an expired domain name once they receive the required authorization from you. Expiration or nonrenewal of a domain name is not a valid reason for denial of a transfer request.

Note that if the registrar has already begun the deletion process on the domain name and its status shows it to be within a 30-day Redemption Grace Period, the name must be .restored. by your current registrar before it can be transferred. 

Registrars MUST place a domain in active status if the registrant chooses to transfer, even after a domain is expired.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GODaddy, Network Solutions, and many other registrars also violate another issue;</p>
<p>They make you renew your domain prior to a transfer, this is a violation according to ICANN. This question is posted at the ICANN website;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.icann.org/compliance/" rel="nofollow">http://www.icann.org/compliance/</a></p>
<p>My domain name has just expired. Can my registrar require me to pay for a renewal before I can transfer to a new registrar?</p>
<p>No. Your new registrar of choice can initiate a transfer request on an expired domain name once they receive the required authorization from you. Expiration or nonrenewal of a domain name is not a valid reason for denial of a transfer request.</p>
<p>Note that if the registrar has already begun the deletion process on the domain name and its status shows it to be within a 30-day Redemption Grace Period, the name must be .restored. by your current registrar before it can be transferred. </p>
<p>Registrars MUST place a domain in active status if the registrant chooses to transfer, even after a domain is expired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/04/11/is-godaddy-violating-icann%e2%80%99s-transfer-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-2148</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 02:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2006/04/11/is-godaddy-violating-icann%e2%80%99s-transfer-policy/#comment-2148</guid>
		<description>Dave, thanks for the post.  I don&#039;t see anything about the transfer denials in the link you sent...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, thanks for the post.  I don&#8217;t see anything about the transfer denials in the link you sent&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zan</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/04/11/is-godaddy-violating-icann%e2%80%99s-transfer-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-2147</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 22:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2006/04/11/is-godaddy-violating-icann%e2%80%99s-transfer-policy/#comment-2147</guid>
		<description>The WHOIS thing is actually already being addressed:

http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-18jan06.htm

One person actually complained to ICANN about this. A few days later, someone from GD apologized to the customer for the &quot;mistake&quot;, and told him to resume moving out.

GD and other registrars may &quot;force&quot; registrants to agree to whatever&#039;s stated in their service agreements. But ICANN still has the final say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The WHOIS thing is actually already being addressed:</p>
<p><a href="http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-18jan06.htm" rel="nofollow">http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-18jan06.htm</a></p>
<p>One person actually complained to ICANN about this. A few days later, someone from GD apologized to the customer for the &#8220;mistake&#8221;, and told him to resume moving out.</p>
<p>GD and other registrars may &#8220;force&#8221; registrants to agree to whatever&#8217;s stated in their service agreements. But ICANN still has the final say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

