<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: .Com taken?  Most opt for .Net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2006/02/08/com-taken-most-opt-for-net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/02/08/com-taken-most-opt-for-net/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:49:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; The rising tide of alternative TLDs - News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/02/08/com-taken-most-opt-for-net/comment-page-1/#comment-1459</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; The rising tide of alternative TLDs - News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2006/02/08/com-taken-most-opt-for-net/#comment-1459</guid>
		<description>[...] ey would register if .com were already taken.  The choices excluded country code domains.  63% said they would register a .net, 18% a .info, 15% .org, and 5% .biz.  Of cou [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] ey would register if .com were already taken.  The choices excluded country code domains.  63% said they would register a .net, 18% a .info, 15% .org, and 5% .biz.  Of cou [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snoops</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2006/02/08/com-taken-most-opt-for-net/comment-page-1/#comment-1172</link>
		<dc:creator>snoops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2006/02/08/com-taken-most-opt-for-net/#comment-1172</guid>
		<description>Most people would simply look for a different term in the .com extension rather than the original term in an alternate extension. Simply look at the difference in .com and .net reg numbers for evidence of that. I think that first step would need to be surveyed aswell for the data to be useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people would simply look for a different term in the .com extension rather than the original term in an alternate extension. Simply look at the difference in .com and .net reg numbers for evidence of that. I think that first step would need to be surveyed aswell for the data to be useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

