Comments on: Deceased man’s name tied up in domain name dispute

By: ramona derosett

ramona derosett — Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:51:44 +0000

Having been a conway fan for 40 years, I think it has been ashame as to how his children sold Twitty City plus everything in the home, and how they treated Dee Henry.
Conway was in love with Dee. His sudden death was difficult on his children, and other family members.Let this man rest in peace, and stop looking for ways to constant
sue.

By: lucysteele

lucysteele — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 03:26:10 +0000

I agree I Think Her Father Would Want Them To Have What Belongs to Them

By: Editor

Editor — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:39:39 +0000

Joni, Thanks for posting

By: Joni Twitty

Joni Twitty — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:52:03 +0000

First of all, the executors of my father’s estate made this agreement with Royce Inman without our knowledge. Our father was in business with Mr. Inman prior to his death but had terminated all business dealings with him. Mr. Inman was not a long time family friend. It appears he was in it for financial reasons. Our father instructed, in his will, that he wanted his life’s work to be entrusted to his four children. For the past twelve and a half years we have fought for his wishes. Approximately a year and a half ago, we finally received the rights to his name, image and music. The fan who posted their opinion on the message board did not have the facts. As for what my father would say, his wishes were clear in his will. I believe in my heart that he would want his family to have his domain name rather than a man who was in it for financial reasons. Especially a man with whom he had terminated all business dealings.